George Orwell’s Big Brother grew up and got a job in Marketing

George Orwell’s Big Brother became an adult in these days, turning his eye from politics to marketing.

Internet companies (not only Google) like BlueKai and eXelate Media now can track all of us down and sell the acquired information about our Internet behavior to advertisers, media buyers and companies, enabling them to translate such golden info into customized advertising placement posted even when, unaware of that, we’re visiting a website not necessarily related to our targeted interests.

It doesn’t matter whether you’re actually visiting a website about your passion for fashion design shoes or for high tech products. In that case, we all know that visiting a website immediately recalls similar products advertisement. Now that these marketing companies  track and store your previous website visits,  an advertising about your favorite shoes brand or high tech device will magically appear even when you’re simply reading an on-line newspaper.

The magic word for that is “cookie”.  How many moms could track down our movements within the house, in every room, by literally following the crumbs we would leave around? Lots of husbands still do and in both cases it is not exactly an action worth of reward, but rather of yelling and punishments. For marketing companies and advertisers instead the so called “Internet cookies”, the digital trace we leave behind every time we visit a website, turned out to be most certainly as yummy as rewarding.

The sales of Internet cookies by marketing companies,  grouped by consumer behavior, whether about cars, or food, represent for advertisers, constantly and compulsively craving info about consumer behavior, the opportunity to access the Sacred Graal of information, guaranteeing, if not eternal life, at least an improvement for the company’s marketing life.

Even if, to legitimately protect your privacy, you’re one of those refusing to be on Facebook, the Temple all advertisers have been trying to penetrate in order to access the Sacred Graal of consumer behavior information (kindly provided by all of us in our Facebook info section, as well as in our chats or posts),  you would still most likely be tracked down by such marketing companies since belonging to any of  those demographics that all together, according to the latest Nielsen study,  made computer and internet as the second most used medium, after TV, in the US.

The latest Nielsen Company study, conducted by the Ball State University’s Center for Media Design, shows that if for consumption and advertising TV is still the number one medium, computer and its related use of internet is the second largest one for activity, surpassing radio and print, ranked in fourth place (Literally at this point ranked as the “Fourth Power”,  as the Italian translation of the 1941 Orson Wells movie “Citizen Kane”, about the rise and fall of a print mogul).

In case one still hopes to escape from the new Big Brother’s eye,  the study,  as reported by the New York Times,  shows that the age group 8 to 54 (divided by 4 age segments, according to the different time and usage of internet),   corresponds to the demographics that uses Internet the most, which, imagine that,  is also the most wanted commercial target by companies, I believe somewhere from age 8 to 49. Side note for the new Twitter addicted (the new social web where to read about your friends and your favorite people and write with a 140 character limitation, halfway between a text message and a blog):  age group 8-24, apparently is the age segment using text messaging the most and therefore the most familiar with such form of communication, in case you want to use the new trend for a marketing campaign.

If former President Bush’s Patriot Act, practically confirmed by President Obama, authorizes government agencies to track all of us down in the name of security, which paradoxically and ultimately guarantee our freedom, now, this further version of web marketing “Patriot Consumer Act” can track all of us down in the name of our proud market economy, which we’ve been trying so hard to patriotically defend, stimulate and keep alive these days.

George Orwell’s Big Brother grew up and he’s now kindly picking up the Oreo cookies crumbs we left last night in front of the web…He’s watching, so you might wanna be more polite and try not to leave any crumbs around.

But maybe it would be unpatriotic.

You oughta know…

In 1996, a girl with long hair from Canada becomes world wide famous by screaming her rage to a man who broke her heart in the song “You oughta know”:

“And I’m here to remind you
Of the mess you left when you went away
It’s not fair to deny me
Of the cross I bear that you gave to me
You, you, you oughta know”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tnbc64XQ1DI

More than 10 years later, in 2008 Alanis Morrissette writes a song called “Not as we”, singing about her transition from a break up to her new life: 

Day one day one start over again
Step one step one
I’m barely making sense for now
I’m faking it I’m pseudo making it
From scratch begin again but this time I as i
And not as we”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj8WoxFzMGo&feature=related

I guess even Alanis Morrissette’s rebellion invevitably achieves equilibrium in time. We all grow up.

You oughta know…

…It definitely takes more courage and maturity to admit one’s insecurity during hard times, instead of faking a total rebellion with a cold heart….oh time is a gentleman, eventually always reveals oneself.

“We become who we are”. No, not Alanis.  That’s Nietschze.

And isn’it ironic. Don’t you think?

Chapter 11

Can you declare emotional bankrupcy like a company would and filing chapter 11? Problems won’t overwhelm you like creditors do and your fragile nerves system would have the time and energy to reorganize itself…

Lately I read “Everyone takes the limits of their own vision for the limits of the world”. A. Schopenauer.

Lately, I’ve been forced to stretch and discover the broader and wider limits of the world..and I guess that’s really good:)…but damn this reorganization!

On Charlie Rose, New Journalism still comes from newspapers?

On Charlie Rose on PBS, Channel 13 for those of you living in New York city, Tom Wolfe, author of “The Bonfire of the Vanities” and founder of the “New Journalism”’s definition, claims that broadcast journalism always follows print’s.  News channels never really break with a fresh story that has not been previously  taken from a newspaper, or checked and confirmed by the wire, a trusted seal of credibility and source of ongoing new material for everybody in this business. 

Wow. Is it live or am I watching a re-run of the show from 20 years ago?

The host and Mr. Wolfe go on on the issue for about 10 or 15 minutes, bringing up different examples of such theory. True, actually. I do agree with that. Nevertheless, is it really true that today’s news come primarily from newspapers? They go on and on talking about print journalism versus broadcast’s, but isn’it a little bit too 80’s just like Tom Wolfe’s books? Don’t they forget about something here?  Didn’t Time magazine in 2006 announced to the  world that “Yes, you. You control the Information Age. Welcome to your world” on the cover of the magazine, making “You” Person of the Year?(http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html) Given their age, background and audience, I’m not surprised about this kind of conversation (or maybe a simple slip of memory, or selective memory?), but speaking of good journalism and of two very good journalists, I believe they should better check their source: Can newspapers today, with declining advertising rate and readers actually moving onto Internet for their news, be really considered as the prime source of news? How about bloggers, Youtube,  podcasting? “You” and digital media have been revolutionizing the language and journalism itself, forcing print and broadcast to constantly chase them. Even Mr. Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times declared in an interview to Haaretz, the Isareli newspaper, that he’s thinking about shutting down the print of the newspaper to actually go only online in 5 years.  http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/822775.html

Well, maybe tomorrow, you blogger will write about it after seeing Tom Wolfe’s interview on You Tube.

an asymmetrical mirror of behaviour

Sometimes I just don’t understand why gestures can’t correspond to our intentions in people’s eyes. People perceive the effect, not the cause and as if that wasn’t enough, we do our best to actually cover that and mislead the purpose of our actions; the tone of our voice, an aborted hug generating a perceived coldness. A word said with too much emphasis, or with the laziness of a thought. 

It’s almost impossible to eradicate a preconception about us and establish a different vision of our pattern of behaviour in the people close to us. We’re generally perceived as they know us, as a repeating expectation of behaviour.

On the contrary, in people that do not know us yet, the stake is to imprint in them the right vision about us. But then, are we really who we think we are, or the others actually perceive us in a different way than we do with ourselves? Again, gestures don’t correspond to our intentions and therefore, we think of the intentions and the others, of course, only see the gestures, or the missed ones…should have, could have, would have…